Supreme Court Backs Parental Rights Over School LGBTQ Books and Classes

In a landmark 6-3 decision on June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor that parents have a constitutional right to opt their children out of public-school lessons involving LGBTQ-themed storybooks on religious grounds.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito held that Montgomery County, Maryland’s policy of requiring elementary students to participate in instruction featuring these books without allowing religious exemptions violated the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause.

Several of the titles at the center of Mahmoud v. Taylor have also appeared in similar lawsuits across the country, where parents, both Christian and Muslim, have sought to either remove the books entirely or at least retain the right to opt their children out.

The specific books that sparked the legal battle in Montgomery County included Uncle Bobby’s Wedding (kindergarten), about a girl adjusting to her uncle’s marriage to another man; Prince & Knight (first grade), a fairy tale romance between two men; and Born Ready (second grade), the story of a transgender child.

Other titles that have drawn objections include Love, Violet, about a girl nervous to give a valentine to another girl, and Pride Puppy, an alphabet book about a dog lost during a Pride parade.

Books challenged by parents elsewhere include Lawn Boy, Gender Queer: A Memoir, and All Boys Aren’t Blue, all of which feature explicit sexual content and gender identity themes.

Elementary and middle-grade books like King and King, Melissa (formerly George), and Julián Is a Mermaid have also faced legal and school board challenges.

Other contested titles include This Book Is Gay, ABC Pride, Heartstopper, Fun Home, It’s Perfectly Normal (a sex education book), Baby Be-Bop, The Drowning of Stephan Jones, and The Education of Harriet Hatfield.

Ironically, many on the political left who support these materials in schools also support Hamas and now Iran, often dismissing legitimate national security concerns as Islamophobia.

Yet many Muslim parents object to LGBTQ-themed books on the same religious grounds as Christians. In societies where girls are expected to cover themselves, much of what takes place at a Pride parade would be considered heretical, and in some Islamic countries, even criminal under Sharia law.

The Court found that the school district’s refusal to provide opt-outs “places an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion” by forcing children to engage with content that “poses a very real threat of undermining the religious beliefs and practices that the parents wish to instill.”

The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor warning that the ruling would create “chaos for this nation’s public schools.”

Initially, the school district followed its “Guidelines for Respecting Religious Diversity” and allowed parents to opt their children out of lessons involving these books, similar to existing opt-outs for sex education classes.

However, in March 2023, citing logistical concerns and fears of stigmatizing LGBTQ students, the school board eliminated the opt-out mechanism entirely, declaring that students could not be excused “for any reason.”

This decision prompted immediate backlash, with over 1,000 parents signing petitions and dozens appearing at heated school board meetings throughout the summer of 2023.

Although Mahmoud v. Taylor focused on Montgomery County, the broader battle over LGBTQ content in schools has played out nationwide, and under the Biden administration, some parents’ efforts to challenge these policies triggered federal investigations.

Across the country, parents, especially conservative Christians, voiced objections to school curricula promoting LGBTQ themes, along with other concerns such as mask mandates, vaccine requirements, anti-racism courses, and diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Many of these protests occurred during public school board meetings, where parents spoke out against books and lessons they felt undermined their religious or moral values.

In response to the rising number of school board protests, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to the Department of Justice requesting that the federal government investigate certain parents under the Patriot Act, characterizing their activities as potential “domestic terrorism.”

Though not limited to LGBTQ issues, these protests frequently centered on LGBTQ-themed books, sex education, and gender identity policies in public schools.

Following the NSBA letter, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memorandum on October 4, 2021, instructing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to monitor and respond to threats against school officials. Internal whistleblower disclosures later revealed that the FBI created a dedicated “threat tag” for school board-related cases and launched investigations into parents who spoke out.

President Trump established the “Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias” on February 6, 2025, appointing Attorney General Pam Bondi to lead the effort. The task force quickly dismantled the Biden-era apparatus that had been investigating Catholics and other Christians.

Now, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor is being celebrated by religious liberty organizations as a major victory for fundamental parental rights.

Ironically, civil rights groups expressed deep concern about the decision’s impact on inclusive education, while seeming to believe that forcing Christian students to endure lessons that violate their religious beliefs is somehow more tolerant than allowing them to opt out.

The Education Law Center called the ruling “a painful setback for equity in public education,” claiming it “places undue stress on students who are already vulnerable to exclusion and marginalization.”

Apparently, these groups fear that allowing Christians to exercise their religious freedom is harmful to LGBTQ students, who ostensibly require every classmate’s presence to feel affirmed. The left appears committed to forced inclusion, regardless of whose rights are trampled in the process.

The post Supreme Court Backs Parental Rights Over School LGBTQ Books and Classes appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.