Exclusive: Was Romania’s Corrupt Liberal-Globalist President Nicușor Dan Complicit in Romania’s December 2024 Electoral Coup?

On the night of November 24, 2024, as polls closed across Romania, Bucharest Mayor Nicușor Dan made an appearance on B1 TV that now deserves far deeper scrutiny.

The votes were not yet counted. Ballots from the Romanian diaspora were still in transit. No agency had offered even a hint about which candidates would advance to the runoff.

But Dan behaved as though the outcome had already been decided—or rather, as though a crisis had already been scripted.

With no official data available, Dan urgently demanded investigations into TikTok “influence operations,” “hidden financing,” and what he called the “sudden surge” of outsider candidate Călin Georgescu.

His warning came before the public knew anything was unusual.

“State institutions need to act now,” Dan declared, sounding less like a candidate reacting to events and more like someone delivering a pre-planned message.

For supporters of Georgescu—long regarded as a nationalist reformer outside the orbit of globalist political networks—Dan’s comments immediately raised suspicions. Why was one of the system’s most favored liberal technocrats hinting at election interference before any results were reported?

Weeks later, the country witnessed something unprecedented: Romania annulled the first round of the election. And the very claims Dan floated on television became the justification for that annulment.

The sequence is striking. Dan’s warnings did not follow the state narrative. They preceded it.

This fact alone has stirred concern among those who believe Romania’s liberal establishment, increasingly aligned with Brussels, NATO bureaucrats, and global digital-regulation agendas, saw Georgescu’s rise as a direct threat to its power.

Dan has consistently framed the 2024 election environment as being under attack by “misinformation.” In later interviews, he pushed for greater state power over online speech, arguing Romania must reconsider “how far freedom of expression goes” and when “misinformation must be curbed.”

For critics, this sounded less like protecting democracy and more like rehearsing a justification for controlling it.

A transcript of Dan’s November 24 appearance—now widely circulated—suggests he may have known about concerns surrounding Georgescu before the public did. That possibility raises a troubling question: did intelligence services, political operatives, or aligned NGOs brief Dan ahead of time?

If so, one could interpret Dan’s appearance not as an act of foresight but as the first public step in a broader strategy: delegitimize the outsider candidate, invalidate the vote, and reshape the election.

To be sure, state authorities maintain that the annulment was lawful and necessary. Some investigations did reveal irregularities in TikTok activity. But the timing of Dan’s foreknowledge continues to cast a shadow.

It forces an uncomfortable question: when a politician predicts a crisis with uncanny accuracy, is he being vigilant—or simply following instructions?

Why did Dan speak at that exact moment, hours before results were known? Who supplied him with information about online behavior and funding flows tied to Georgescu’s campaign? And do internal memos, communications, or intelligence summaries exist that link Dan’s televised remarks to an institutional directive?

For a man whose public image rests on being an independent figure, the episode raises doubts about who truly propelled him to power. Was Dan acting as a guardian of democracy—or as the compliant face of a political establishment eager to neutralize an outsider?

Whether Nicușor Dan is innocent, misled, or directly involved remains to be seen. But the timeline is impossible to ignore: a politician speaks of annulment and foreign influence before the democratic process has even played out.

Romania deserves answers. And until those answers come, the legitimacy of Dan’s presidency will remain clouded by one question that refuses to fade:

Did Nicușor Dan warn of a crisis—or help create it to stop Călin Georgescu?

The post Exclusive: Was Romania’s Corrupt Liberal-Globalist President Nicușor Dan Complicit in Romania’s December 2024 Electoral Coup? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.