YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP: Comey’s Attorneys Reportedly Provide Doctored Transcripts in His Perjury Trial
You can’t make this up – Jim Comey’s attorneys reportedly doctored transcripts when providing documents in his perjury trial.
Paul Sperry shared some observations on the documents that Comey provided to the courts in his perjury case. One observation is shocking. According to Sperry, when presenting evidence in a motion to the court as part of his perjury defense, James Comey’s legal team altered two words in a transcript of his 2020 Senate testimony to make it seem as if Sen. Ted Cruz asked Comey a key question he didn’t actually ask him during the hearing. YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP.
NEW: In presenting evidence in a motion to the court as part of its perjury defense, James Comey’s legal team altered two words in a transcript of his 2020 Senate testimony to make it seem as if Sen. Ted Cruz asked Comey a key question he didnt actually ask him during the hearing
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 11, 2025
The following question was asked of Duck.ai about what happened:
Can a defendant alter words in a transcript he presents as evidence in a trial?
The answer is:
No, a defendant cannot alter words in a transcript that is presented as evidence in a trial. Transcripts are official records that accurately capture what was said during legal proceedings. Altering them would be considered fraud and could lead to serious legal consequences, including charges of contempt of court or tampering with evidence.
Not so good for Comey.
His “super” attorneys also reportedly used a movie to support their argument in Comey’s case.
LOL: James Comey’s high-priced legal team just cited a movie to support the argument Trump didn’t have to directly instruct Halligan to indict Comey: “A ruler need not take the form of literal instructions. See Becket (1964 film) (‘Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?’)”
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 11, 2025
In their defense, Comey and his friend claimed they did nothing wrong, but they hid their identities in doing it.
James Comey and Dan Richman claim they weren’t doing anything wrong when they leaked sensitive info to their NY Times handmaiden Michael Schmidt, yet they both used aliases in their emails and texts –with Comey posing as “Reinhold Niebuhr” and Richman posing as “Michael Garcia.”
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 10, 2025
In addition, in Comey’s effort to claim vindictive prosecution, Comey’s attorneys have to do much more than they have to date.
NEW: To prove “vindictive prosecution,” Comey’s lawyers have to do more than show Trump’s posts. They must show “direct evidence” PROSECUTOR HALLIGAN acted w/ “genuine animus” & “solely to punish” Comey for exercising a protected rt. They’ve failed to overcome the legal barriers.
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 11, 2025
It looks like Comey’s associates, accomplices, and attorneys will fabricate anything and insert it into the court documents to make their point. Not good.
The post YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP: Comey’s Attorneys Reportedly Provide Doctored Transcripts in His Perjury Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.